Another “Shut Up and Sit Down Nigga’ ” Action By Morton

UGOTNERVE received a report from an educator sharing that they had received a letter from Morton giving them a directive that they are no longer to communicate about “school issues” during “school hours.”

Morton weakly cited that when the teacher responded to or addressed the emails that Morton had sent, they were taking away from the instructional time of students.  

WHAT THA”?  Can someone help Fred with the professional responsibilities of educators.  They are advocates FIRST. Advocating for our students, excellence in education, safe schools, and exposing issues of public concern IS OUR JOB!

CAN WE SAY HYPOCRITE AND BULLY???  Morton is getting pretty desperate in his efforts to silence the opposition.  He has broken so many laws from trespassing on an employee’s home to illegally recommending an educator for nonrenewal, which he had to reverse.

In his letter, he went as far as to threaten the educator with disciplinary action and/or termination if they continued to address “school matters” during “school time.” (Typical bully move!)

To make matters worse, Morton’s letter also instructed them to refrain from “non-instructional” related duties during school hours.  It is clear that this is superintendent that has NO CLUE as to what the educators within this county do.  Does he not know that “non-instructional” activities are listed as a component of every educator’s job description within the county?  So, in essence, he is saying, “DON’T DO YOUR JOB OR YOU WILL BE DISCIPLINED OR FIRED!”

So that means that educators can no longer do the following during school hours:

1) Call parents about behavior

2) Plan and/or serve on committees such as the “Social Committees”

3) Complete duties related to clubs that they sponsor (step team, football, basketball, etc.)

4) Return emails 

5) Plan student, parent, or staff events.

6) Meet with parents

and so on and so on.

We failed to mention one important fact, the educator that he singled out is African-American.  The letter that Morton sent communicated that same message the Winston did during last Thursday’s school board meeting, “Nigga’, I am tired of you backtalking me.  So what if you are right, so what if I am wrong, and no, I ain’t goin’ give you an apology for how we have mistreated, discriminated, fabricated, and lied on you.  I have far too much pride for that.  Pride that is more important to me than the children.  SHUT UP AND SIT DOWN!

Oh well, will someone tell Fred that we AIN’T gon’ sit down and we AIN’T gon’ shut up, so do the right thing and ask God to forgive you for all that sin. The lives of our children deserve more than he is worth.  Morton has no intention of changing or making any of his past wrongs right.  It is past being sad, now it is PA-THETIC! 

KUDOS to the parents that have began to collect signatures to remove the school board.  It looks as though we will have more than enough to get the ball rolling just before the next school board meeting.  While a majority of us are African-American, our white and hispanic brothers and sisters are coming out of the wood work from every school throughout the East End, from Varina Elementary to Varina High.  

Many have shared that not only do Morton, Royal, Jepson, Rokenbrod, and Ellis have to go; others are moving to remove Varina’s principal, “Mrs. O”, due to her failure to create a safe school setting for students.  A story was shared of how Varina’s principal violated county policy by permitting an at-risk expelled student, that was considered trespassing if he were to come on campus, was told by “Mrs. O” that he could attend the senior prom AND graduation.  Many were disgusted at her total disregard for the district policies and the safety of other students.  As one parent shared, HENRICO IS OUT OF CONTROL AND THEY ALL HAVE TO GO!

Well, the underground movement is gaining momentum!  We are referring parents and educators to our pro bono attorney team from DC that has graciously offered to initiate any and all legal actions that are needed.  We will also host another “OCR clinic” this weekend where we will assist in the filing of complaints online for suspected civil rights violations by Henrico County.  

The Community Council for Integrity in Education’s (CCIE) website will be up and running within the next month, and ALL administrators, parents, educators, students, community leaders, attorneys, government officials, and others are welcome to join.  CCIE has just received two more parent coordinators that will organize parents throughout the East End for upcoming protests and press conferences.

THE TIME FOR CHANGE IS NOW! OUR CHILDREN CANNOT WAIT ANY LONGER!

 

KEEP UP THE NERVE! 

Students Report That Rolfe Has “Screw Corner”?!

During our parent meeting this evening, it was reported to UGOTNERVE’s team that John Rolfe Middle School has a “screw corner”, where students meet in order to engage in highly inappropriate acts.

Parents are said to be outraged at this information due to the fact that the expectation is that their students are in class and properly supervised.

Students went on to state that they use text messaging, while in the classroom, to establish a meeting time, which is usually after lunch, but before dismissal. Many of them shared that teachers permit them to use their phones in class, and allow them to leave the class after lunch.

One of our readers was so outraged that they vowed to report the matter to social services this week. Another stated that they would pay unannounced visits to Rolfe during the afternoons in order to ensure that their students are in class and not in the “screw corner.”

Another parent of a male student stated that she has repeatedly requested that Rolfe’s teachers refuse to allow her son to leave the classroom but they have ignored her request. She also stated that she plans to file a complaint due to the fact that she is concerned over what “could be”, and as she stated, Mr. Armstrong is not interested in being proactive with our children.

Thank you to those of you that shared this horrific condition that both, our willing and unwilling, children are subjected to.

Will the VADOE act NOW?

KEEP UP THE NERVE!

Just Unjust

What is the best way to describe the conditions at John Rolfe Middle School this past year under the leadership of Dalton and Armstrong as instructional imposters? (Remember, they were both “hand-picked” from Varina High by Morton.)

Just Unjust!

What is the best way to describe the mentality of Fred Morton, superintendent, and his central office cronies?

Just Unjust!

What is the best way to describe the indifference, arrogance, and lack of urgency that is blantantly demonstrated by the previous school board members and the present ones?

Just Unjust!

What is the best way to describe the fact that the East End desperate deficiencies, educational proverty, and substandard leadership against the West End’s state of the art facilities, more than enough resources, and quality leadership?

Just Unjust!

The fact that parents feel powerless, intimidated, ignored, devalued, and unmotivated to advocate for their own children against the tyrannical leadership that exists within Henrico County Public Schools?

Just Unjust!

The fact that educators feel powerless, intimidated, ignored, devalued, unmotivated, and far to self-consumed to serve as advocates for children, which is their primary responsibility, even above teaching, due to the atmosphere of retaliation and discrimination that has been established by the leadership of Henrico County Public Schools is?

Just Unjust!

The fact that an “ol’e head” Henrico school board member can propose to extend the contract of a superintendent that has left our children worse off now than when he first began over four years ago, without consulting those that she represents is?

Just Unjust!

The fact that the other “new head” Henrico school board members can blindly follow her lead to extend his contract so that he “can retire”, without consulting those that they represent, is?

Just Unjust!

The fact that white staff members within Rolfe Middle Schools can violate district, state, and federal laws as easily as they walk without consequence, while black staff members have fabricated and falsified documents made against them for doing the right things, as well as refusing to cover-up for Armstrong, Rokenbrod, and Ellis is?

Just Unjust!

The fact that students with special needs spent nearly two months without classes, but were instead sent to in-school suspension or the nurse’s office all because Davina Johnson, the clearly unqualified Director of School Counseling refused to do her job over the summer by planning the master schedule is?

Just Unjust!

The fact that Johnson and Ellis failed to ensure that students with special needs received the required supports in order to complete their testing according to state and federal guidelines is?

Just Unjust!

The fact that Armstrong, Jordan, and Rokenbrod are repeatedly supported by Morton, Royal, Jepson, and the school board for their unethical, immoral, and clear mistreatment of African-American children and educators is?

Just Unjust!

The fact that Fred Morton felt justified in sending one of his stooges to the home of a Henrico County employee on the Friday night before they were scheduled to speak before the Office of Civil Rights against Henrico County to “deliver a message” is?

Just Unjust!

The fact that a dedicated, disciplined, and highly qualified veteran administrator from Rolfe Middle School can be discriminated against, deprived of a promotion that she clearly deserves, and targeted as an outsider under the guidance of Morton, Royal, and Armstrong is?

Just Unjust!

The fact that the school board will choose to fund “extra” facilities on the West End, while failing to fund “basic” facilities on the East End is?

Just Unjust!

The fact that some students on the East End’s school facilities are being educated under third world conditions in one of the richest counties in the Commonwealth without immediate and decisive action by this district’s board, is?

Just Unjust!

The reality that Fred Morton, Marilyn Royal, Philip Jepson, Andy Armstrong, John Rokenbrod, Courtney Ellis, and members of the school board can sleep at night when they are responsible for the loss of nearly two years, eighteen months, seventy-two weeks, three hundred and sixty days, 8,640 hours, 518,400 minutes, and 31,104,000 seconds from the lives of our children, is?

Just Unjust!

The fact that this county’s leaders spend more time “covering up” and “doctoring up” instead of giving our children, families, and communities a “hand up”, is?

Just Unjust!

The fact that Marilyn Royal, Director of Middle Schools, can “target” educators that hold her accountable instead of “targeting” the enormous number of failing middle schools within this county that are under her direct leadership is:

Just Unjust!

The fact that a mother can come before Henrico’s school board pleading for the educational welfare of her child with special needs, after calling central office repeatedly with no response, only to be ignored by arrongant, heartless, and callous individuals who have no heart for ALL children, is:

Just Unjust!

The fact that Philip Jepson can engage in ethically questionable human resources practices and refuse to properly investigate a handwritten threat against an employee within the district without remorse, accountability, or action being taken against him is:

Just Unjust!

The fact that Marilyn Royal and Andy Armstrong can direct an educator to cease from documenting unsafe conditions within Rolfe Middle School, then go on to fabricate allegations of “breech of confidentiality” against the same educator as they use and abuse a parent and her child is:

Just Unjust!

The fact that a white male educator can advise a student to ignore the instructions of an African-American educator, admit that what he did was “unprofessional”, and not be removed from John Rolfe Middle School is:

Just Unjust!

The fact that Michelle Bolton, a white instructional aide at Rolfe, can continually falsify passes for students in order for them to skip and report to class tardy, yet still continue to be employed is:

Just Unjust!

The fact that Philip Jepson and Andy Armstrong, principal at Rolfe, can demand that a teacher permit verbally and physically abusive students into her classroom when he refuses to discipline them as habitual offenders, is:

Just Unjust!

The fact that John Rokenbrod can take as long as three months to complete a disciplinary referral, all the while permitting disrputive, defiant, and disrepectful students to roam the schools harassing educators and students, is:

Just Unjust!

The fact that Fred Morton fought for and spent millions of dollars on securing ibooks and dells for students, but fails to fight as hard to provide competent leadership and safe schools for students, which is far more important, is:

Just Unjust!

The fact that Henrico has risen to the third highest drop our rate in the Commonwealth, increasing the falure of African-American males and Hispanic males, and there is no drastic efforts by Morton or Royal to address this (considering that a majority of our children decide to drop-out in the nineth grade, right after they leave middle schools) is:

Just Unjust!

The fact that Armstrong and Rokenbrod can permit a suspended student, who is clearly trespassing, to remain on the school grounds, continuing to be verbally and phsically aggressive throughout the school without supervision, is:

Just Unjust!

The audacity and ignorance of Diana Winston, chairwoman of Henrico’s school board, to publically degrade, disrespect, and belittle a broken African-American woman that was not only a former veteran employee that was wrongfully terminated by incompetents like Armstrong and Jepson, but is also a parent of a special needs child, is:

Just Unjust!

It is time for justice to be restored to Henrico County Public Schools for our children. In order for justice to “flow like a riva'”, the dams of “corruption, favortism, discrimination, and unethical treatment” of ALL peoples must be torn down, and its builders must be removed.

KEEP UP THE NERVE FOR THE MANIFESTATION OF JUSTICE!

The Double Standard Continues

UGOTNERVE has not commented on Reverend Jeremiah Wright and his comments that “supposedly” have negatively impacted Obama.

Whether one agrees or disagrees with Rev. Wright’s comments, the blatantness of “the double standard” within our culture screams out at us.

We are from the south side of Chicago and were fully aware of Wright and his political-socio-spiritual stance as a pastor.

When Obama was questioned about Rev. Wright, he responded wrong.  What he should have said was that his faith is none of anyone’s business, and then referred the media to those that are backing McCain, like John Hagee and Pat Robertson.

There is a double standard that exists within our culture.  UGOTNERVE has clearly documented it with Morton and Henrico County Public Schools, now the national media is proving the point as well.

While not all white people are the enemy and all black people are not our friends, the truth of the matter is that white folks view everything from their limited eurocentric, self-centered, superior-complex.  Any words, actions, beliefs, or thoughts that deviate from what they deem to be “acceptable” is wrong, period.

Morton proved that to us when dealing with Mrs. Lucas.  Winston proved that to us when dealing with the former employee of Henrico County that is African-American.  Now, the media proves it to us when dealing with Wright.

If you have ever been in a black church, you understand the dynamics of the experience.  Black churches, historically, were our havens on earth.  Places where we gathered to not only worship God corporately, but where we socialized and politicized our plight and fight for freedom, equality, and justice.

You will remember that Martin Luther King, Jr. spoke in churches.  The NAACP held voter registration drives in churches. Abolitionists worked through the churches to free slaves.  

There is a gross injustice and clear demonstration of utter ignorance when whites and some out of touch blacks attempt to “pontificate” the black experience within the black church without applying a historical perspective of how the deep seeded racism, that continues until this day, has murdered the spirits of black people, stolen their dignity and self-autonomy, and destroyed any sense of identity as it relates to themselves, and more importantly, to God.

Unless one has grown up in the black church, one cannot understand the cultural norms of the black church.  

Then hear how Pat Buchanan justifies the “double standard”:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/18/msnbcs-buchanan-wright-_n_92094.html

It is utterly amazing how white leaders like Morton and Buchanan have one set of rules for themselves, which usually permit them to get away with everything, and then have another set of standards for others.

KEEP UP THE NERVE UNTIL WE REMOVE THESE PEOPLE FROM THEIR POSITIONS OF INFLUENCE!

 

 

Judge Order Henrico County Schools To “Stop Stalling” With SPED Student

One of the parents at our last advocacy group meeting shared this article with over sixty others.  This is just one more example of how the leaders within Henrico County Public Schools will do all that they can to rape our most vulnerable children within our society of their right to an education of excellence.  They have no remorse, nor do they have any desire to change.  

Henrico can spend $100,000 on a “cabana”, but deem it inappropriate to invest worthwhile funds into our children that need them the most, even when they received additional federal monies to do so.  

The district leaders and board stall and delay, stall and delay, stall and delay; all in the name of prideful politics.  All the while, our children are suffering while Morton, his cronies, and the board play their games!

UGOTNERVE thinks that it is not the children that have “special needs”, it is the adults.

We printed a portion of the article below.  Go to http://www.styleweekly.com/article.asp?idarticle=13018 to read it in its entirety, and KUDOS to these parents for holding Henrico ACCOUNTABLE!  

THEY MUST STOP STALLING WITH ALL OF OUR CHILDREN!

*********************************

“….In June, Payne found that Henrico County Public Schools had failed to adequately teach Reid Tutwiler, an 8-year-old boy with autism. After three years of disputes with the school system, the boy’s parents, Courtney and Rick Tutwiler, pulled their son out of the county school and placed him in the private Faison School for Autism, which costs about $65,000 a year.

Payne ordered the Henrico school system to stop stalling, as it had through hearings and appeals, and pay the Tutwilers the money spent on Faison. Today, Reid Tutwiler is enrolled again in Henrico Public Schools, in an individualized special-ed program. And while the school system still is working out how much it pays the Tutwilers and for what period of time, the family stands to receive around $500,000 in attorney’s fees and tuition reimbursements. Likewise, Linda Peterson says, her family expects their case will cost Hanover County upward of $250,000.

Consider the proverbial floodgates opened. The combined settlements that Henrico and Hanover counties are forced to pay in the two cases are small potatoes, some say, compared with the potential onslaught of lawsuits that could come as a result. 

Payne’s rulings in favor of the Petersons and Tutwilers may give traction to other parents who are dissatisfied with their children’s special-ed programs. Still, fearing an uphill battle against a bureaucratic school system, many stop short of legal action. On this, Linda Peterson is resolute: “More parents need to do what we’ve done.”

Most parents don’t. They just file complaints. Yet the scene behind the cases that make headlines appears fractured. In 2005, parents made 107 formal complaints called “due process” filings on behalf of their children in special-ed programs in Virginia. Of those, parents prevailed in only two.

It’s a concern for legislators, says David Brat, an economics professor at Randolph-Macon College. Brat helped research and draft a bill introduced last year by state Sen. Walter Stosch, R-Henrico, providing up to $10,000 in tuition assistance for parents of children with disabilities. It didn’t pass, but the bill will be reintroduced in the 2007 General Assembly session. “Our bill is a reaction to those stories,” Brat says of the Peterson and Tutwiler cases. 

“These cases should be a wake-up call for schools,” says Peter W.D. Wright, an attorney who specializes in special-education law. Based in Deltaville, Wright and his wife, Pamela, have published books and papers on the subject. They lecture nationwide and operate a Web site, Wrightslaw.com. Autism accounts for more special-education litigation than any other disability, Peter Wright says.

It’s easy to see why. Autism is taking school systems by storm. The number of children with autism has skyrocketed to epidemic proportions. It’s estimated that one in 166 children has some form of the disorder. 

In Henrico, from 2002 to 2005 there was a 52.3 percent increase in the number of children in public-school programs with autism. That number jumps to 83.1 percent in Chesterfield; 84.6 percent in Hanover; and 5.8 percent in Richmond. (The Richmond number appears equally chilling, educators say, because it suggests children aren’t being properly diagnosed.) The total number of children diagnosed with autism in all four localities who receive public instruction jumped from 438 in 2002 to 695 in 2005. 

Congress first enacted the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in 1975. But the problem with the legislation, some say, is that the act doesn’t factor out specific disabilities — autism as opposed to muscular dystrophy or cerebral palsy, for instance — and how school systems should deal with the disabilities.

The state doesn’t mandate how local school districts develop special-education programs for children with autism. Despite that there are more children diagnosed with autism than any other disability, there’s no specific autism curriculum or autism certification requirements for teachers in Virginia public schools, leaving ample room for interpretation.

Payne’s recent rulings suggest it may be time for a systemic overhaul. Henrico County Public Schools is in the process of implementing changes as a result of the Tutwiler case, says Barbara Driver, director of special education for the school district. Driver says the spike in autistic students reflects a national trend, albeit one still considered relatively new. “Tutwiler reiterated the need for [accurate] data collection,” Driver says, “that structural means is the No. 1 area we’re focusing on.” 

Henrico recently added two full-time “technical support” positions dedicated to autism, she adds. And in situations where a child’s autism is so severe that a public-school setting — even classrooms with a 1:3 child-to-teacher ratio — isn’t adequate, Henrico will send the child to a private school such as Faison. “We’re doing the best we can to meet every child’s individual needs,” Driver says. “This is growing and it’s a very, very complicated issue.”

It’s an issue often negotiated through complaints with school systems before winding up in court. 

“The Peterson and Tutwiler cases show us what many in the special education community have known for years,” says Philip Carter Strother, an attorney representing the Petersons. “There is a serious need for a fundamental restructuring of the way our communities provide educational services to our children who suffer from disabilities.” 

The cases reveal chronic compliance problems by the school districts that aren’t confronted until parents become intensely involved. In order to get the results of, say, a Tutwiler or Peterson case, parents also must be able to afford specialized legal counsel, he says. “If more parents challenge the school districts’ current approach, the equation will shift, and it will become cost-prohibitive for the school districts to litigate these cases individually,” Strother says. “In turn,” he adds, “the schools will be financially pressured to develop appropriate programs.”

But what are those programs or initiatives, and how much time and money will it take to implement them? 

Richmond School Board representative Carol A.O. Wolf, who home-schools a son with a disability, says an answer could be found in a kind of charter school for children with autism.

It would be a regional effort, Wolf says, such as the Maggie L. Walker Governor’s School. She stops short of suggesting a segregated environment that runs counter to “mainstreaming” a child in a traditional classroom setting.

“Thirty years ago nobody thought about autism,” Wolf says. “But now we have to figure out how we’re going to meet the needs of these children and not keep getting caught up in protracted legal battles.”

For Linda Peterson, the fight is ever more personal — and immediate. “We can’t afford to waste any more time,” she says. ”
 

 

What Does God Say About Raising Our Children?

So much is being said, and so much advice is being given about how to raise our children from different people, organizations, and so-called “experts”.

The challenge that we face today is not HOW we will raise our children, but WHO will raise our children.  Some parents have left their child rearing responsibilities up to their own parents.  Grandparents raising their grandchildren is more common today than ever before.

Others have left it up to the schools to raise their children.  After all, teachers spend more time with their children on a weekly basis than most parents do.

Still others are leaving it up to the streets to raise their children.  Parents that have to work three jobs to make ends meet, cannot afford daycare or afterschool programs, and we even have some that just cannot control their children.  As a result, they end of loosing them to the streets and all that the streets have to offer, including gangs, drugs, prostitution, and homelessness.

UGOTNERVE had the opportunity to work with a group of homeless children that had homes and schools that they belonged to, but felt that the streets were a safer and more caring place than home or school.  Not only is this a horrific testament to the state of our homes and schools, but it speaks to the fact that a child would rather take their chances with those they KNOW do not care about them than those that PROFESS to care about them but really do not.

The goal was to minister to these children, in hopes of not returning them back to their homes or schools, but convincing them that they are so valuable, beautiful, talented, and intelligent that they deserve better than the streets have to offer.  They deserve better than those that neglected them at home and at school have to offer.  As a result, we had to convince them to TAKE back what was stolen from them by adults that said they cared but did nothing to show it.  

We speak of how our children are “out of control”, and that “nothing can be done to save them”, when the reality is that the adults and our society, as a whole, are the ones that are “out of control”.

As we advocate against the injustices of school officials in Henrico County, we are often reminded of the short period of time for which we have to work.  

THERE IS A CRISIS AMONG OUR CHILDREN, THE SITUATION IS URGENT, BUT MOST ADULTS FAIL TO REALIZE THIS!

They would rather build buildings instead of building children, LANCE.

They would rather promote politics instead of promoting children, FRED.

They would rather sacrifice children instead of sacrificing their pride, ANDY.

They would rather walk on the backs of our children as they satisfy their own agendas as opposed to allowing our children to walk on our backs in order to give them a better life, MARILYN.

They would rather fund “cabanas” instead of funding “hot water and textbooks”, LAMONT.

They would rather say “WE LUVS THE CHILDREN”, instead of realizing that love is an ACTION word, not a “mumbling word.”

They are content to sit back and watch our children go to hell in a hand basket while they sit on their “blessed assurances” and feel no obligation to stop it, even though they have the power to.

God says that they are wrong. Here is what He says about raising our children:

God’s Promise About Children

 [Distributed by Way of Life Literature’s Fundamental Baptist Information Service. These articles cannot be stored on BBS or Internet sites and cannot be sold or placed by themselves or with other material in any electronic format for sale, but may be distributed for free by e-mail or by print. They must be left intact and nothing removed or changed, including these informational headers. This is a listing for Fundamental Baptists and other fundamentalist, Bible-believing Christians. Our goal is not devotional but is TO PROVIDE INFORMATION TO ASSIST PREACHERS IN THE PROTECTION OF THE CHURCHES IN THIS APOSTATE HOUR. If you desire to receive this type of material on a regular basis, e-mail us, give us your name, address, and the name of the church you are a member of, and request to be placed on the list. Please note that this is not a free service. We take up a quarterly offering to fund this ministry, and each subscriber is expected to participate. To unsubscribe or to submit a change of address, send your name and the request to fbns@wayoflife.org. This is not an automated list. Changes in the database often require two to four days to activate. Some of these articles are from O Timothy magazine. David W. Cloud, Editor. O Timothy is a monthly magazine in its 17th year of publication. Subscription is $20/yr. Way of Life Literature, 1701 Harns Rd., Oak Harbor, WA 98277. Way of Life publishes many helpful books. The catalog is located at the web site — http://wayoflife.org/~dcloud. The End Times Apostasy Online Database is also located at this site. 360-675-8311 (voice), 240-8347 (fax). fbns@wayoflife.org (e-mail)]

August 17, 2000 (Fundamental Baptist Information Service, 1701 Harns Rd., Oak Harbor, WA 98277, fbns@wayoflife.org) – The following is from a sermon that was preached by Bruce Lackey (1934-1988) back in the early 1970s and was first published in O Timothy magazine, Volume 7, Issue 4, 1990:

“Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.” (Proverbs 22:6)

This tremendous admonition and promise is for parents, prospective parents, grandparents, relatives, and anyone else who has a heart for children! It is absolutely reliable, since“all the promises of God in him are yea, and in him Amen, unto the glory of God by us” (2 Cor. 1:20). The true and living God, who cannot lie, will keep this promise; our responsibility lies in the first word, train. But before we get to that, we must consider the way.

Some interpreters understand this to mean “his way,” that is, the child’s way. They say that parents and teachers must learn the natural inclinations of the child and direct him thus. To prove that this is the wrong explanation, we need only consider Isaiah 53:6, “All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.”

Since the verse says, “All we,” that must include children. Every child has already turned “to his own way;” he does not need to be trained in it. Worst of all, the Lord describes “turning to our own way” as “the iniquity of us all,” and reveals the outrage of that iniquity by telling us that it was what Christ bore on the cross. Clearly, then, we do not need to train up a child in his own way, which in God’s sight is sin.

Charles Bridges said that when a child is born, two ways lie before it: the way in which he WOULD go, and the way in which he SHOULD go. That says it succinctly!

Psalm 58:3 teaches us that the child begins going his own way, which is iniquity, immediately after birth. “The wicked are estranged from the womb; they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.”

How often does the Scripture teach that we are born sinners! All the more reason for training the child in the way that he should go. The way is God’s way.

A parallel verse, Gen. 18:19, also shows this. “For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the Lord, to do justice and judgment; that the Lord may bring upon Abraham that which he hath spoken of him.” God knew that Abraham’s children would keep, not their own way, nor some counselor’s way, nor the world’s way, but the way of the Lord.

WILL THE CHILDREN BE PERFECT?

The significance of this phrase will be seen when we consider the fact that many people do not believe Proverbs 22:6, because they have seen some child who was brought up in a Christian home turn out to be less than perfect. We seem to think that Prov. 22:6 is a promise of sinless perfection, so that if a child does anything wrong, either the verse is not true, or the child’s training was not scriptural. That mistake will be recognized and forsaken when we realize that “the way he should go” is the Lord’s way, but it does not mean sinless perfection. How can we be sure? By remembering that God said that Abraham’s children would keep His way; then by reading about the lives and doings of Isaac and Ishmael. They certainly were not perfect!

Thus by comparing Scripture with Scripture, we have learned, so far, that “the way he should go” is not his own way (Isaiah 53:6), but the Lord’s way (Gen. 18:19), and that keeping God’s way does not mean sinless perfection. What, then, does “keeping the Lord’s way” mean? It describes the worship of the true and living God. Both Isaac and Ishmael did some things wrong (see Gen. 16:12 & 26:7), but they never went after a false god.

Another good example is David. Even though Scripture records several of his sins (see 1 Sam. 27:8-12 for example), God describes his whole life in 1 Kings 15:5 by saying,“David did that which was right in the eyes of the Lord, and turned not aside from any thing that he commanded him all the days of his life, save only in the matter of Uriah the Hittite.” Since “all scripture is inspired of God,” (2 Tim. 3:16) this must be a true description. There will be no problem if we remember that when God speaks of someone who has kept His way, or who has done right in His eyes, He is speaking of the worship of the true God as opposed to idols. David never turned aside from worshiping God and His commands regarding such.

To prove that “keeping God’s way” means worshiping Him as opposed to worshiping idols, we need only consider the description of Amon, in 2 Kings 21:21-22. “And he walked in all the way that his father walked in, and served the idols that his father served, and worshiped them: And he forsook the Lord God of his fathers, and walked not in the way of the Lord,” Clearly, “walking not in the way of the Lord” was equal to “serving idols.”

For an opposite example, let’s consider 2 Kings 22:2, describing Josiah; “And he did that which was right in the sight of the Lord, and walked in all the way of David his father, and turned not aside to the right hand or the left.”

CHILD TRAINING OFTEN NOT 100% SUCCESSFUL   Another mistake which is often made regarding the promise in Prov. 22:6 is thinking that someone is either 100% successful, regarding the training of his children, or 100% a failure. We have already seen that God does not look at it that way, when we considered Isaac, Ishmael, and David.

A little common sense and observation will teach us that parents may succeed in training their children to believe the right doctrine, but fail in teaching them to pray every day. Likewise, some parents succeed in training their children to be faithful to church, but they fail to teach them to be soul winners. There are degrees of success and failure. Real life shows us that there are faithful church members, even church leaders, who are not holy. And, some are more holy than others. These are good examples of the fact that there are degrees of success and failure.

Parents are responsible to train their children in all that is included in “the way of the Lord.” That one way would include many ways. We often forget that, assuming that one or two things are all that important.

We must not only train them to be saved, but also to be spiritual. Training is necessary if they are to know the Bible, if they are to get answers to their prayers, if they are to be soul winners.

If parents fail to train their children in some particular way, they will be letting the world do the training. If we fail to teach our children to live holy lives, we will be letting Hollywood train them to be unholy.

There is no way to prevent their exposure to Hollywood. Even if there is no television, no movie-going, no rock music, children will learn about those things by simply being in this world. The influence of Hollywood is pervasive; no part of life escapes it. How much more, therefore should godly parents train their children in matters of holiness, to offset the evil influence which they will naturally receive.

If we fail to teach them the misery of drinking wine, Hollywood will convince them that wine is a necessary part of a tasty meal, especially if it is to be romantic. Unless we teach them biblical morality, Hollywood will convince them that adultery and various other forms of immorality are the normal way of life

Even though we cannot prevent their exposure to these evils, we can certainly counteract them with the power of scripture! And that is where the word train comes in.

TRAINING OR LECTURING?

Why did the Lord say, “Train?” Why not, “Lecture?” In all sports, there is a trainer. It is not training when the athletic director lectures the players that they should go out and become stars. It is training when the person who already knows what to do shows others how to do it; then, when the player does something wrong, the trainer corrects him and shows him how to do it properly. In most cases, the player must practice the particular play several times before he becomes proficient at it. In other words, it is a process of teaching, showing, correcting, practicing, and repetition. Usually, there is a lot of trial and error.

There probably has never been an athlete who did everything perfectly; all make mistakes. The trainer does not give up after one or two mistakes. The player is not kicked off the team for one or two mistakes. The trainer is not considered a failure when a player makes a mistake. We should think of these things when we consider the Lord’s admonition that we should “train up a child in the way he should go.”

WHEN SHOULD CHILD TRAINING BEGIN?

When should we begin? Hannah gives us a good example, in 1 Sam. 1:24, “And when she had weaned him, she took him up with her, with three bullocks, and one ephah of flour, and a bottle of wine, and brought him unto the house of the Lord in Shiloh: and the child was young.” Some commentators say that the Jews, at that time, did not wean their children until the age of two or three years. That may seem like a long time to us, with our modern ways, but it might have been, especially when we consider that milk would not have been as available to them as it is to us. Even if that explanation be accurate, Samuel was still very young to be surrendered by his mother to live in the house of the Lord!

Samuel was born into the priestly line; but according to Scripture, the priest did not assume priestly duties until the age of thirty. If Hannah had been like many mothers, she would have forgotten all about religious training until just before Samuel turned thirty! To the contrary, she began early; she “lent him to the Lord” at the age of two or three, to begin learning the ways of serving God as His priest. Waiting until thirty could be too late; Samuel could have been set in the ways of wickedness and have no interest in the things of God. Hannah was wise; let us imitate her godly example.

We must not consider working in the nursery and other children’s classes to be a glorified baby-sitting job, but a scriptural opportunity to train the little ones in the ways of Christ. We must not consider mothers who give their lives to the training of their young children to be unintelligent, or incapable of having a “career” in this world, as so many think today. Training young children is scriptural, challenging, and extremely wise! It does require much thinking, praying, and preparation; perhaps that is why so many look for ways to avoid it. But there is no greater challenge than that of teaching biblical truth to little ones. If a person cannot put the truth of the gospel on the level of a child, that person does not understand the gospel very well.

Every Christian parent would like for his/her child to turn out like Samuel; if that occurs, we must do as Hannah did and begin early.

HOW OLD IS OLD?

If we begin early, we must repeat the training, according to Prov. 22:6, until the child is old. But when is one old, in biblical language? In many cases today, people think that, after children become teenagers, you cannot do anything with them. Yet, ask a twenty-one year old man if he considers himself to be old and see what he says. Ask a thirty-year-old woman if she is old! Both common sense and Scripture teach us that old does not mean the teenage years.

Genesis 42 and 43 give us examples of Jacob’s commanding his sons to go to Egypt to get food. Egypt was several hundred miles away and that trip would have to be made by walking, or riding some animal, or in some uncomfortable wagon. Every one of those sons was married and had children, yet Jacob did not hesitate to command them to make such an arduous journey; and, as far as the scriptural record is concerned, there was no resistance on the part of any son to that command. Jacob did not believe, as many do today, that you cannot do anything with them when they get grown. Of course, people today object to this reasoning by saying that these events occurred in another time when customs were different. While we admit that this is true, we should remind ourselves that God gave us details such as these in His Word for “doctrine, reproof, correction, and instruction in righteousness,” (2 Tim. 3:16). We will not find a better example than those given in the Bible.

Hannah continued her concern for Samuel. 1 Sam. 2:19 says that she brought him a coat from year to year, when she came up with her husband to offer the yearly sacrifice.

Another proof of the fact that God hold parents responsible to keep training their children, even after they are grown, is found in 1 Sam. 2 & 3. In 2:22, we learn of the sin of Eli’s sons: “Now Eli was very old, and heard all that his sons did unto all Israel; and how they lay with the women that assembled at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.” It is obvious that these sons were grown men. We learn later that they were married. God tells us, in 3:13, that Eli was both responsible and negligent regarding the actions of his sons:

“For I have told him that I will judge his house for ever for the iniquity which he knoweth; because his sons made themselves vile, and he restrained them not.”

Eli’s responsibility was so great, in the eyes of God, that He pronounced judgment on his house because Eli made no effort to restrain them. We must carefully note that it was not Eli’s fault that they sinned, but rather that he restrained them not. Did he say, as so many do today, that nothing could be done with them after they were grown? God showed him to be wrong!

ALL CHILDREN HAVE SOME REBELLION

The fact is that all young people rebel against righteousness; some to a greater degree, some not so much. Solomon is a good example; he was taught by his father and mother, according to Proverbs 4:1-5 and chapter 31, but he rebelled in many ways. When he repented, he wrote Ecclesiastes to record his confession and repentance. He was speaking from experience, when he wrote the words of Eccl. 11:9-10, “Rejoice, O young man, in thy youth; and let thy heart cheer thee in the days of thy youth, and walk in the ways of thine heart, and in the sight of thine eyes: but know thou, that for all these things God will bring thee into judgment. Therefore remove sorrow from thy heart, and put away evil from thy flesh: for childhood and youth are vanity.”   He knew that young people like to be happy (“let thy heart cheer thee”), that they like to do whatever they desire (“walk in the ways of thine heart”), and that they like to do what they see immediately, not caring about the unseen future (“and in the sight of thine eyes”).

Because this is true of all young people, they will do wrong. The desire of their heart is sin, according to Jer. 17:9, “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked.”

This describes the heart of every single person who has ever been born, except Christ. The testimony of Psa. 33:15 is that “He fashioneth their hearts alike.” We are all alike, in the evil of our hearts. That evil does not always express itself in the same way, but the basic evil is there. All young people sin, no matter how good their training.

When the young man walks “in the ways of his heart and in the sight of (his) eyes,” he is sinning, because the verse ends by saying, “for all these things God will bring thee into judgment.” Every young person rebels! Some do it outwardly and brazenly; others keep it inside. When the rebellion shows itself, many parents think they are failures, or that the Bible verse is not true, or is not for our dispensation, or that scriptural training did no good, or some other such depressing reaction. To the contrary, when we see the rebellion, or learn later that it existed in the heart, we should realize that this simply proves the Bible!

Another proof of this is found in Heb. 12:2, where Christ is called “the author and finisher of our faith.” Most of us realize that we cannot be the author of someone’s faith; we cannot make people believe. We give the Word, but God does the work which results in believing (see John 6:29). We also need to realize that we can no more be the finisher than we could be the author! Our witness and our training are necessary, but we do not finish anyone’s faith. That is the work of Christ, and He continues to work all through that believer’s life to accomplish it.

Solomon was trained right, but rebelled in his youth. Then, when he was old, he did exactly what Prov. 22:6 promises: he did not depart from the training of his early days.

Another example is Manasseh, the son of godly king Hezekiah. Hezekiah was certainly not perfect, but he was a praying man (read Isa. 37 & 38), and a humble man (2 Chron. 32:26). Most of us would like to get answers to our prayers in the spectacular way that he did! He must have trained Manasseh correctly, besides giving him some good examples to follow, because we read that even though Manasseh committed some awful sins when he was young (2 Chron. 33:1-10), he did repent when he was old. Verses 11-19 give us these thrilling words:

“And when he was in affliction, he besought the Lord his God, and humbled himself greatly before the God of his fathers, and prayed unto him: and he was entreated of him, and heard his supplication, and brought him again to Jerusalem into his kingdom. Then Manasseh knew that the Lord he was God…and he took away the strange gods…and he repaired the altar of the Lord…His prayer also, and how God was entreated of him…behold, they are written among the saying of the seers.”

In the light of all these scriptures, let us realize that the heart of every young person has the seed of rebellion in it. The training which is spoken of in Prov. 22:6 is required repeatedly, until he is old. It is when he is old that he will not depart from it; and “old” does not mean sixteen, or twenty-five.

THE TRAINING MUST BE WITH SCRIPTURE

This training must not only be repetitious, but it must be with Scripture. Lois and Eunice, Timothy’s grandmother and mother, are good examples. 2 Tim. 3:15 says, of Timothy,

“From a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.”

We should teach children the doctrines of Scripture, helping them to memorize key verses where these doctrines are found, as well as verses which promise victory and encourage faith. Children can memorize easily, much more so than adults; therefore, let us teach them to memorize the Bible in their early years.

John Newton was converted as an adult, after many years of sin, directly because of the Scripture which his mother had taught him to memorize before he was seven years old!

Some parents try this briefly, then stop because they do not see immediate results. Again, Scripture will correct this error. Lois and Eunice taught Timothy, but he was not saved until he was a teenager, and that was through the preaching of Paul (see 1 Tim. 1:2 and 1 Cor. 4:15). God’s word always has its promised results, although they may not come immediately, or in the way that we anticipated. Are we willing for someone else to win our children to Christ, to reap where we have sowed? Sometimes that is God’s way (John 4:37-38), and we certainly cannot improve on it.

Faithfulness to obey the Lord always brings the fulfillment of His promise in His time and His way. It takes parents and preachers and teachers and witnesses. Paul had no children, but he reached the children of others.

Taking the children to church is not enough. It is vital, but it is not all that God requires. We must teach them the Scripture, a responsibility which is found not only in the New Testament, but also in the Old.

Psalm 78 gives us good instruction:

(1) We should teach our children what our parents taught us. Verse 3, “…Which we have heard and known, and our fathers have told us.”

(2) In teaching children Bible stories, we should emphasize the power of God. Verse 4, “We will not hide them from their children, shewing to the generation to come the praises of the Lord, and his strength, and his wonderful works that he hath done.”  When we tell about David and Goliath, for example, let us not only mention David’s courage, but the power of God in giving that great victory. How often is the credit given to David, or to luck! Likewise, Samson’s great strength was not due to his long hair, but to his obedience to God and God’s resulting power.

(3) We should tell the children that one of the purposes for which God gave the Bible is that we might teach it to the little ones. Verse 5, “For he established a testimony in Jacob, and appointed a law in Israel, which he commanded our fathers, that they should make them known to their children.” God wants the little ones to know that the Bible is for them.

(4) They should learn it so that they can teach it to their children. Verse 6, “That the generation to come might know them, even the children which should be born, who should arise and declare them to their children.”

(5) We should teach the children to set their hope in God and not repeat the sins of their ancestors. Verses 7-8, “That they might set their hope in God, and not forget the works of God, but keep his commandments: and might not be as their fathers, a stubborn and rebellious generation.”

Thus we are to teach children the Scriptures and the reasons for learning them.

BEWARE OF HYPOCRISY IN CHILD TRAINING

In doing all this, the proper attitude is vital. Children can see through the hypocrisy of adults easily. They learn to know what we are like before they can even understand our words; they read our facial expressions, they notice our actions, they see our priorities. They learn to discern people before they learn language! When they learn to speak, then to read and write, they do not lose that ability. They still notice the tone of voice and the facial expressions of others; it is a result of several years experience. Even when they are teenagers, they can spot a hypocritical adult almost immediately. Anyone who has worked with them knows this well.

Therefore, we must have the proper attitude. Christ emphasized this in His stinging condemnation of the Pharisees and scribes:

“Well hath Esaias prophesied of you hypocrites, as it is written, This people honoureth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me.” (Mark 7:6). What was the end result of such hypocrisy? Vs. 13, “Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition,” (which was an outgrowth of their evil hearts). If we are not genuine in our obedience to the Lord, our teaching of the children, taking them to church, etc., such hypocrisy will nullify Scripture.

If we teach our children to pray, they must see us praying. If we teach them that the Bible is God’s Word, they must see us reading it and loving it. If we insist that they go to church, we must go with them and always speak constructively about the house of the Lord before them. If we teach them about hell and heaven, they must be urged to repent and believe on Christ for the salvation of their souls. If we see them misbehave in church, we must be sure that our correction is from a motive of wanting them to do right, rather than from being embarrassed before others. If they hear us praise the Lord in church, they ought to hear us praise the Lord in the business world, and in the hospital, and at the cemetery.

Titus 2:7 emphasizes this very responsibility, by saying, “In all things shewing thyself a pattern of good works … sincerity … sound speech that cannot be condemned.”Who would receive even the choicest food from a leprous hand? The condition of the one who gives the word is important. The prodigal son assumed that his father would receive him; had he seen that attitude before? No doubt the father had shown forgiveness many times in that young man’s life, perhaps toward him, perhaps toward others, so much so that he did not even entertain the possibility that he would be rejected. That speaks volumes for the father’s example!

Almost everything we learn is from an example. How long would it take for a child to learn to tie shoe laces, if he only heard a lecture on it?

Children learn to pray from hearing others pray. Parents ought to take their children with them when they try to win lost souls. They will learn to witness and win people to Christ by seeing it done. They will learn daily Bible reading by being a part of that as they grow up. They will learn to pay attention and get something from a sermon if they see parents doing it, then hear them discussing the message later. They learn tithing when they see the years of blessing on their parents who have thus obeyed the Lord.

PRAYER IS CRUCIAL IN CHILD TRAINING

All of these suggestions and directions will be energized by prayer.

Without prayer, they will probably have little effect. A good example is Manoah, the father of Samson, in Judges 13:12. After the angel had revealed to his wife that they would have a son who would be the deliverer of Israel, he prayed for directions in training that child. “And Manoah said, Now let thy words come to pass. How shall we order the child, and how shall we do unto him?” We note that the angel did not merely say, “Use the Bible,” but gave him specific directions to be followed. The vow of a Nazarite was not for everyone, although it was a part of Scripture.

We must pray about each child. There are Scriptures which all should obey: there are others for specific ones. We may not know what the future holds for each of our children, but the Lord does. If we seek Him, He will direct us to those portions which are needed by each one. God knows whom He will call to preach, or to teach, or to be a deacon; He knows who will be a father or mother; He has plans for some to be leaders and some to be followers. Beside that, each child is an individual, not only in his personality, but in his particular needs and problems and temptations to sin. Why are some people slaves to alcohol, while others may drink “moderately” and never get drunk? Why are some slaves to gambling, while others may take it or leave it? We do not have the answers, but we know that God has perfect knowledge of each child and can direct the praying parent and teacher to the specific verses which would meet that child’s need.   How many mothers have known that a newborn boy would be a preacher? We have heard such testimony. Is it not likely that she would have taught that boy all along, with that in mind? What if the Lord revealed that a boy or girl would be a missionary. Would not those parents do their utmost to keep that child from having any racial prejudice?

Sunday school teachers should also pray for the children, individually. It is also helpful to visit in the homes, trying to know them a little better, so that specific teaching may be given. We know very little about people when we see them only in church. Our prayers are limited. This is a good lesson for preachers, also!

WHAT TO DO WHEN DISCOURAGED, OR WHEN WE FAIL?

After all this, a parent or teacher may be overwhelmed. This may seem like an impossible task. Also, one may be conscious of failure and be quite depressed. Sometimes, we think we are doing very well, then, without warning, everything caves in, sin is committed, and we think that we completely failed. But, we must remember that we will all fail, to some extent. What then shall we do?

The Holy Spirit inspired the book of Ecclesiastes to show us exactly what to do in such a situation. If there was ever a failure, it was Solomon! He rebelled against all his training and even disobeyed divine revelation, but one thing can be said in his favor: he did confess that failure and repent of it, then he showed it by exhorting others not to follow his example.

In Eccl. 7:26-28, he confessed that he had disobeyed God by marrying seven hundred wives and three hundred concubines (see Deut. 17:17). He confessed that he was a sinner when he was taken in by them. His sinful attitude made him look for the wrong kind in the first place, and he found them. Then, in 9:9, he corrected that, exhorting others to “live joyfully with the wife whom thou lovest all the days of the life of thy vanity, which he hath given thee …” We note that he did not say “the wives,” but “the wife.” And he emphasized that it should be the wife “whom he hath given thee.” Here, then, was a preacher who went wrong, but has repented; now he is instructing his children not to follow his example, but to do right in God’s eyes. He has explained to them the misery and heartache of sin. He has not tried to cover up, or make excuse. Such is true confession and repentance.

More evidence is found in 12:9-14. Instead of brooding about his backslidings and failures, he not only confessed and repented, but made a sincere effort to warn others. “And moreover, because the preacher was wise (remember that God had given him this wisdom, and that God’s gifts are without repentance, Rom. 11:29), he still “taught the people knowledge; yea, he gave good heed, and sought out, and set in order many proverbs.” This required a lot of work. Are we willing to work that hard in teaching our children?

He tried to get just the verses that each child needed (vs. 10, “The preacher sought to find out acceptable words.”). He taught them that God’s word will motivate us (vs. 11,“The words of the wise are as goads”), so that they would seek the Scripture when they are discouraged, or backslidden. He emphasized that the Bible would give them stability (“and as nails fastened by the masters of assemblies”). He stressed that the Bible, even though written by many men, actually all came from the one true God (“which are given from one shepherd”).

The Lord, who is our shepherd, has given us His words, which will do everything for us that we need. How necessary it is that the child learn who the Author of the Bible is: He is the Good Shepherd, who gave His life for the sheep. A shepherd never leaves his sheep; children need to learn that if they know the Lord Jesus Christ as personal Saviour, they will never be alone!

People drink alcohol because they are lonely; they take drugs for the same reason. Likewise, some people sell their bodies, while others commit suicide, all because they are lonely. Knowing Christ, the Good Shepherd, would prevent all that. He said, “I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee. So that we may boldly say, The Lord is my helper, and I will not fear what man shall do unto me.” (Heb. 13:5-6)

May the Lord help us to believe Prov. 22:6 and obey it, sincerely expecting the promised results.

The Legacy

She could not give her children gold So she gave them faith to have and hold. She could not give them royal birth … A name renowned throughout the earth. But she gave them seeds and garden spot And shade trees when the sun was hot. She could not give a silver spoon Or servants waiting night and noon. She gave them love and a listening ear. And told them God was always near. She could not give them ocean trips Aboard majestic sailing ships. But she gave them books and quiet time, Adventures found in prose and rhyme. She could not give them worldly things But what she gave was fit for kings. For with her faith and books and sod She made each child aware of God.

Update On “Lawyer” Lucas

UGOTNERVE wanted to give you an update on Mrs. Lucas’ situation.  One of her peers at John Rolfe Middle School coined the name, “Lawyer Lucas” when referring to her because of the fact that she knows the law, will argue the law, and will hold Fred and them accountable for the law.  WE LOVE IT!  

Unfortunately, Henrico County Public Schools does not love and appreciate her as much as we do.  Can you blame them?  “A God-sent-fighting-warrior-highly educated-ain’t-intimidated-by-white-bullies-says-what-she-means-means-what-she-says-calls-out-black-wanna-be-sell-outs-going-to-make-Henrico-keep-their-promise-to-ALL-children-very-well-connected-uses-words-like-stealth-missiles-eloquent-orator” advocate that AIN’T goin’ no where!

She shared that she has been extremely busy helping to organize The Community Council for Integrity In Education, (CCIE).  The community advocacy group that has vowed to keep a close “eye” on Henrico County Public Schools in order to hold Fred and them accountable for their words, actions, and attitudes.  She shared how pleased she is with the exposure that UGOTNERVE’s blog is getting, in addition to how proud she is that others have joined the effort of the “power of the pen” that UGOTNERVE empowers them with.  The blog staff, readers, and exposure are skyrocketing! 

Lucas shared that she has experienced additional discriminatory, retaliatory, and racist behavior at the hands of Fred Morton, Henrico’s Superintendent.  The lengths that this man will go to intimidate, silence, and get rid of her is UTTERLY AMAZING.  He and his cronies have falsified documents, told lies, broken district, state, AND federal laws; yet still cannot get rid of her.

In an April 24, 2008 letter, Morton conceded defeat and withdrew the illegal, unethical, and retaliatory recommendation for nonrenewal from the school board’s consideration.  While he thinks that he was doing Lucas a favor, he was actually doing himself and the board one.  Make no mistake, Lucas would have “blown them out the water” in the court of law.  What they do not know is that she still plans to based on the “hell” that they put her through all because she told them the law, advocated for black and poor children, and held school officials accountable for their failure to do the right things for ALL children.

Lucas shared that the threat of nonrenewal was never an issue for her due to the fact that she told the board, on numerous instances, during school board meeting speeches, that she “was willing to loose her job behind her advocacy for children.”  Only fools refuse to believe the truth! Rokenbrod, Ellis, Armstrong, Royal, Jepson, Kinlaw, and Morton did not have a clue as to how far she was AND is willing to take this so that the lives of children are no longer wasted by ignorant, incompetent, uncaring, selfish instructional imposters that would rather sacrifice the life of a child than sacrifice their time to do their job.

Lucas shared that Morton became so desperate in his efforts to intimidate her that he sent someone to her home on a Friday night at seven o’clock to “deliver a message.”  Keep in mind that this was the Friday night before the Monday that Lucas and others were scheduled to testify before the Office of Civil Rights against Henrico County, Armstrong, Rokenbrod, Ellis, and Morton.  Can we say Tony Soprano flunkies!?

Lucas joked about how while she is highly educated and knows how to carry herself professionally, when she heard that Morton had sent one of his stooges to her home in Henrico County, while she was out of town, the south-side of Chicago sista’ came out of her!  She reported the actions to OCR and the local police as a trespassing report, then confronted Morton and the board about the inappropriateness and illegal nature of their actions.  And think, Morton has the nerve to reprimand someone else for being “unprofessional, insubordinate, and having inappropriate tone.”   Everyday, in every way, he and his cronies, including school board members (especially that Winston-woman), show that there is a standard for them and a standard for every one else….hypocrites!

Lucas also shared how teachers at Rolfe are still scared for their jobs, and so they remain silent, while Fred goes around saying “70%!, 70%, 70%! of Rolfe’s staff is HAPPY!”  She continues to ask how a REAL leader can be happy with “70%” of anything, especially when it is one blink away from failing based on Henrico’s standards.  Did Fred forget to read “Failure is NOT an option”?  That seems to be the case because he is doing EVERYTHING that the author says NOT to do.

Lucas has granted UGOTNERVE to reprint the letters from Morton, Armstrong, and Rokenbrod so that others will see how instructional imposters operate and attempt to falsely document things.  She also stated that she has been approached by a publishing company in order to write a book about her struggle.  All of the funds from the book will go to the CCIE.  UGOTNERVE will make sure that Morton, Jepson, Royal, Armstrong, Rokenbrod, Ellis, and the board members get their own autographed copy!

Lucas says that she is going to write the book so that others will be educated, empowered, and encouraged to stand on God, the law of the land, and for our children, no matter the cost.

Lucas is now fighting for her right to return to Rolfe since Morton removed her in a “fit of rage.”  He really needs to be removed NOW!  Immature leadership is worse than incompetent leadership.  Unfortunately, Henrico has far too much of both!

We asked Lucas if she would do this all over again, and without hesitation, she responded,

 

 

“YES!, how can ANYONE be silent, comfortable, and content when children are being abused, misused, neglected, and mistreated right before our eyes??! I do not care what Morton says or does, because ultimately, he does not determine the his next heart beat, God does.  God also hold me accountable for my assignment, which is to usher in justice and equality on the East End.  While I thought that others would be co-warriors in the fight because of their “promises to fight” (like John Montgomery), I see that they have no intention of getting in the war for the lives and futures of our children.  You can’t expect comfort in a war and you must be willing to sacrifice all when you fight for what you believe in.  Once you do this, others with good hearts, but weak minds, will gain the courage to fight, which is where we are at!  I love it and would do it all over again!, Ain’t nobody mad but the devil, and Morton of course.”

We don’t have to tell her, but Lucas, KEEP UP THE NERVE!

Fired Teacher To Hold Corrupt School Officials Accountable!

The tide is changing….

The tide is changing…

The goal:  make incompetent, politically driven, child sacrificing instructional imposters EXTINCT!

Other educators in VA are not only standing on their principles, but are risking their jobs to do so against superintendents and school boards that are bullies….hmmmm, sounds familiar!

See:

ired Teacher Wants to Join School Board
Prince William Candidate Says He Would Hold ‘Corrupted Folks Accountable’
By Ian Shapira
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 25, 2007; B05

 

Manes Pierre, an English adjunct professor with the online University of Phoenix, sticks out among the candidates for Prince William County School Board.

Pierre, 40, was a county school teacher from 2004 until the school system terminated his employment this spring, according to Prince William school sources. His probationary contract was not renewed, the sources said, primarily because of alleged problems he had with other teachers.

The sources declined to be identified, citing the confidentiality of personnel matters, but Pierre confirmed the general circumstances of his departure. He also denied having any trouble with former colleagues and said job evaluations showed he had an exemplary record. He believes his contract was not renewed because he had voiced concerns about the use of certain federal funds at Stonewall Middle School near Manassas, as well as Freedom High School in Woodbridge, where he taught English for Speakers of Other Languages and U.S. history.

“It was complete retaliation,” Pierre said. “I will not compromise my credibility and ethics when I know that federal funds are being used for purposes other than educational.” The funds at issue, Pierre said, were meant for ESOL instruction.

Pierre’s unusual candidacy — as a former employee terminated by the school system he now wants to help oversee — distinguishes what is an otherwise low-key campaign for the board of Northern Virginia‘s second-largest school system.

Pierre is one of two challengers facing incumbent board member Julie C. Lucas (Neabsco) in the Nov. 6 nonpartisan election. The other is Belkacem Hacene-Djaballah, the head of a local foreign language school.

In another competitive School Board race, for an open Brentsville district seat, D.R. “Desi” Arnaiz, a technology company owner, faces Gilbert A. Trenum Jr., a systems engineer for a defense contractor. Six incumbents face no opposition for other board seats.

Lucas, a board member since 2002, declined to comment on Pierre’s job history, citing the confidentiality of personnel matters.

Also, Pierre has filed two complaints against the Prince William schools with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in the past two years, both of which have been dismissed.

As a teacher in Prince William for fewer than three years, Pierre had a probationary contract, the sources said, which meant he could be let go without cause and without the possibility of lengthy, closed-door personnel hearings. Some teachers felt “threatened” by him, one source added: “He was one of those people who constantly wanted to create problems.”

Questions about Pierre’s relationship with the school system began percolating in public last month on a Virginia politics blog, Black Velvet Bruce Li.

Pierre, born and raised in Haiti, said he was a teacher in Florida before moving to Prince William. From 2004 until this spring, he taught at McAullife Elementary, Stonewall Middle and Freedom High School.

Frank E. Barham, executive director of the Virginia School Boards Association, said it is not uncommon for aggrieved former school employees to run for school board — and win. “They come in with an agenda or an ax to grind,” he said.

Pierre said that, if elected, he wants to cut some administrative jobs, make it easier for employees to raise concerns, increase the graduation rate and reduce the use of trailers at overcrowded schools.

With a bit of humor inspired by his favorite U.S. movie star, Pierre said: “I am the ‘Chuck Norris‘ candidate who will hold corrupted folks accountable, wherever they may be within the school division.”

If Only You Were White!

Following Thursday nights school board meeting, we began to look at the matter in terms of “black and white” literally.

An educator that worked with Diana Winston at Baker Elementary, shared that she was not surprised by Winston’s highly inappropriate and vicious tone that was used against Mrs. Massie, a parent, former employee, and parent with a special needs child.  The educator stated that she was surprised at the fact that Winston lost control of herself in public. Hmmmmm, can we say PRESSURE???

We all asked the question, if Mrs. Massie had been white, would Winston have treated her with dignity and respect?  We all know the answer to that!  Of course, Massie would have had to be white AND rich to avoid the verbal abuse that WInston subjected her to on Thursday.

Well, we don’t want to be WHITE.….we will just settle for Henrico County Schools being RIGHT, which means that some “dead weight, weak links, and selfish agendas have got to go!”

Come on now, while we know many are still in shock over Winston’s actions and the board’s indifference to African-American speakers…which they cannot help at this point.  They have embodied institutionalized racism within their minds, spirits, and souls.  This is why they do not feel compelled to move NOW to correct Rolfe and Varina’s leadership; nor do they care any about the facilities that our children are forced to face everyday.  After all, in their minds, OUR children will end up in the jail or grave, so why invest in state of the art schools for them when they can invest in state of the art field houses for the West End.

Under this board’s leadership and Morton’s guidance,failure is the goal, success is not an option, safety is sporadic, competence is a luxury, and a quality education is a dream.

They have got to go!

KEEP UP THE NERVE!

Do We Need to BAG Bagby?! Well, At Least McBride Isn’t Taking Our Children For A Ride!

This article was sent to UGOTNERVE today.  Bagby, the SOLE African-American on Henrico’s School Board, has “come out the bag” again with ANOTHER one of his comments to the newspaper.  He had the NERVE to say:

“Everyone understands that we are duly charged with maintaining educational facilities. But we also are charged with the whole child and that includes athletic facilities,”

OK, Mr. Bagby, so it is clear that the charge that you speak of only applies to the West End where “the whole child” is the focus, and providing the “comforts” for that child are your priority.  

The way we see it, OUR East End children, you know, the ones that you have been elected to represent?  You are duly charged to educate them on a wholistic level as well.  For them, it is NOT about such superficial thing as “athletic facilities.”  

You and the rest of the confused board members are “duly charged” to provide our children with:

HOT WATER TO WASH THEIR HANDS PROPERLY

HOT WATER TO SANITIZE DISHES PROPERLY

CLEAN AND OPERATING TOILETS

CAFETERIAS THAT ARE SAFE FOR WORKERS

CLASSROOMS WITH HEAT AND AIR CONDITIONING

MORE CLASSROOMS TO REDUCE OVERCROWDING

TEXTBOOKS FOR EACH TEACHER AND STUDENT

PAPER FOR TEACHERS

OUR CHILDREN NEED IN-SCHOOL MENTOR PROGRAMS

OUR CHILDREN NEED A FULL-YEAR READING PROGRAM

OUR CHILDREN NEED A FULL-YEAR MATH PROGRAM

And on…and on….and on….

The Community Council for Education is going to speak with our legal eagles in order to organize a suit against Henrico County based on an age old legal mandate….remember Brown v. Board of Education…that whole “separate, but equal” requirement.  Well, Henrico’s school board repeatedly neglects the basic needs of East End children and families.  While it is not totally their fault due to the fact that the East End families have not advocated for what they need, but then again, when we elect individuals to represent us, one would think that they would do it.  Not the case in Henrico Public Schools.  Looks like another Office of Civil Rights complaint is brewing from the over thirty families that are “sick and tired of being sick and tired”. 

Bagby’s words are unreal.  To make matters worse, he is a member of the NAACP.  So much for advancing colored people when you plan a “field house” before you plan a safe “school house”.   He is on our list to remove as well.  Our children deserve better and we do NOT have time to play.

Fred Morton, as the superintendent, is REQUIRED to ensure that school facilities are maintained properly to ensure safe, clean, and legal facilities for our children.  The fact that we even have to discuss this issue speaks to the character, priorities, and heart of the previous and present school board members.

Henrico School Board MUST have a three-year plan in place in order to bring the East End’s facilities and quality of education up to the level of the West End in order to provide EQUITY in educational opportunities for ALL children.  If not, then we will see them in court. 

 

How can this board, especially Bagby, even THINK about giving “EXTRA” to some children (mostly white and upper class), when other children do not have the “BASICS”????????? 

While McBride took a stand, she did not actually vote AGAINST the budgetary action.  While we are not pleased with her weak stance, we are pleased that at least she spoke out against it…which is what the others should have done, especially Bagby.

WE CAN NO LONGER PERMIT THIS IRRESPONSIBLE, HEARTLESS, AND UNCARING BOARD CONTINUE TO NEGLECT AND ABUSE OUR CHILDREN.  

How are they different from child abusers?

Read for yourself:

****************************************************

By LISA CRUTCHFIELD
TIMES-DISPATCH STAFF WRITER

Athletes at two Henrico County high schools can look forward to state-of-the art field houses.

In the meantime, the School Board will have to figure out how much of the projects to build now and how to fully pay for them.

The board voted last evening to go forward with design plans for building a new field house at Deep Run and renovations and an addition to the existing one at J.R. Tucker.

“Everyone understands that we are duly charged with maintaining educational facilities. But we also are charged with the whole child and that includes athletic facilities,” said Lamont Bagby, Fairfield District representative on the board.

The initial funds for the projects were approved in a previous Capital Improvement Program budget.

While the board awaits the design plans for the field houses, it will have to determine funding sources and decide whether to build the facilities in one or two phases. Last night’s vote gave the go-ahead for architects to create plans for the basic and expanded facilities.

“We take seriously our duty of appropriately spending taxpayer dollars and believe the investment in these field houses, and therefore our students, is wise and prudent,” said board Chairwoman Diana Winston.

Linda McBride, Brookland District representative, abstained from voting. She said she supports the Phase 1 options but will not vote to pay for design of the second phases.

“To design facilities that we have no money to build is very difficult for me to support,” she said. McBride said any lottery funds the district may receive should go toward additional classrooms for overcrowded schools before expanding athletic facilities.

Architectural design plans for the possible second phases of the field houses would add about $81,400 for Deep Run and $52,817 for Tucker.

Deep Run High opened in 2002 but has never had a field house. The first design option would create a new 9,100-square-foot facility. Phase 2 would add 3,300 square feet.

For the Deep Run project, $2,268,283 already has been allocated. The School Board would need to add approximately $447,949 for Phase 1 or $1,326,585 to build both phases.

Deferring the second phase of the project for six years is estimated to cost an additional $1,225,000.

J.R. Tucker’s field house is out of date and has flooding issues. The first design option includes renovating existing facilities and adding a fitness center to bring the space to 9,030 square feet. Adding the second phase would total 12,030 square feet.

For that project, $1,560,103 has been allocated. An additional $456,356 would be needed to build Phase 1; building both phases would require an additional $1,136,270.